Tis a good design.
Might it not be able to contain more shuttle craft?
Search found 27 matches
- Mon May 10, 2010 8:38 pm
- Forum: Approved Specifications
- Topic: Wildcat Class - 2nd Attempt
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3483
- Mon May 10, 2010 8:18 pm
- Forum: Approved Specifications
- Topic: Luna Class
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3507
Re: Luna Class
Looks pretty good, but I could see fitting marines on it, even the smaller ships carry a few around even if just for the purpose of extra defense. A squad would seem to fit in as they might not see frequent use, but they would be useful on the ground for away missions and such... I've only ever see...
- Wed May 05, 2010 2:27 pm
- Forum: Approved Specifications
- Topic: Steamrunner Class
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6026
Re: Steamrunner Class
After doing further research, DITL, ACTD and a ST Encyclopedia, I think that the Steam runner has been over armed. It's unlikely to be able to carry such a compliment, let alone fire them.
- Mon May 03, 2010 8:53 pm
- Forum: Approved Specifications
- Topic: Lexington Class
- Replies: 21
- Views: 10411
Re: Lexington Class
Galaxy is made for exploration, it's designed to make maximum use of speed.
The Lex is a carrier, designed to carry things.
The Lex is a carrier, designed to carry things.
- Mon May 03, 2010 2:32 pm
- Forum: Approved Specifications
- Topic: Steamrunner Class
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6026
Re: Steamrunner Class
Considering it is supposed to be called a streamrunner I can see the reason, I did a little research myself.
Yep the ammo sounds a lot better.
Yep the ammo sounds a lot better.
- Mon May 03, 2010 2:16 pm
- Forum: Approved Specifications
- Topic: Lexington Class
- Replies: 21
- Views: 10411
Re: Lexington Class
Good points I wasn't thinking that way before.
- Mon May 03, 2010 9:36 am
- Forum: Approved Specifications
- Topic: Lexington Class
- Replies: 21
- Views: 10411
Re: Lexington Class
Just a quick thought if the ship can carry 10,000....why not increase the size of the normal compliment?
also....is it supposed to have two compliments of quantum torps.
also....is it supposed to have two compliments of quantum torps.
- Mon May 03, 2010 9:26 am
- Forum: Approved Specifications
- Topic: Steamrunner Class
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6026
Re: Steamrunner Class
Fair enough...time to find faults then For a steamrunner (name implies slow) being a light explorer, it goes one hell of a speed. Also, light explorer means often no deep space missions and rare combat. A reduction in Quantums might be a brilliant idea. For such a small ship, engineering is unlikely...
- Sun May 02, 2010 11:37 pm
- Forum: Approved Specifications
- Topic: Steamrunner Class
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6026
Re: Steamrunner Class
Whoa I'd love one of these... >_>
applies.
edit
if there are no objections, could we push this one through with a basic set of specs and then readjust if there are complaints?
applies.
edit
if there are no objections, could we push this one through with a basic set of specs and then readjust if there are complaints?
- Sun May 02, 2010 10:48 pm
- Forum: Approved Specifications
- Topic: Lexington Class
- Replies: 21
- Views: 10411
Re: Lexington Class
Hm, I think that the new maximum speed should take into account the heavier loading capacity, so this should be right. The dual core however would enable a lot more power to be dedicated towards weapons, especially since carriers are potentially sitting ducks once engaged. Then again, I think the Di...