Search found 27 matches

by Enmui Darkheart
Mon May 10, 2010 8:38 pm
Forum: Approved Specifications
Topic: Wildcat Class - 2nd Attempt
Replies: 6
Views: 3481

Re: Wildcat Class - 2nd Attempt

Tis a good design.

Might it not be able to contain more shuttle craft?
by Enmui Darkheart
Mon May 10, 2010 8:18 pm
Forum: Approved Specifications
Topic: Luna Class
Replies: 6
Views: 3505

Re: Luna Class

Looks pretty good, but I could see fitting marines on it, even the smaller ships carry a few around even if just for the purpose of extra defense. A squad would seem to fit in as they might not see frequent use, but they would be useful on the ground for away missions and such... I've only ever see...
by Enmui Darkheart
Wed May 05, 2010 2:27 pm
Forum: Approved Specifications
Topic: Steamrunner Class
Replies: 11
Views: 6025

Re: Steamrunner Class

After doing further research, DITL, ACTD and a ST Encyclopedia, I think that the Steam runner has been over armed. It's unlikely to be able to carry such a compliment, let alone fire them.
by Enmui Darkheart
Mon May 03, 2010 8:53 pm
Forum: Approved Specifications
Topic: Lexington Class
Replies: 21
Views: 10410

Re: Lexington Class

Galaxy is made for exploration, it's designed to make maximum use of speed.

The Lex is a carrier, designed to carry things.
by Enmui Darkheart
Mon May 03, 2010 2:32 pm
Forum: Approved Specifications
Topic: Steamrunner Class
Replies: 11
Views: 6025

Re: Steamrunner Class

Considering it is supposed to be called a streamrunner I can see the reason, I did a little research myself.

Yep the ammo sounds a lot better.
by Enmui Darkheart
Mon May 03, 2010 2:16 pm
Forum: Approved Specifications
Topic: Lexington Class
Replies: 21
Views: 10410

Re: Lexington Class

Good points I wasn't thinking that way before.
by Enmui Darkheart
Mon May 03, 2010 9:36 am
Forum: Approved Specifications
Topic: Lexington Class
Replies: 21
Views: 10410

Re: Lexington Class

Just a quick thought if the ship can carry 10,000....why not increase the size of the normal compliment?

also....is it supposed to have two compliments of quantum torps.
by Enmui Darkheart
Mon May 03, 2010 9:26 am
Forum: Approved Specifications
Topic: Steamrunner Class
Replies: 11
Views: 6025

Re: Steamrunner Class

Fair enough...time to find faults then For a steamrunner (name implies slow) being a light explorer, it goes one hell of a speed. Also, light explorer means often no deep space missions and rare combat. A reduction in Quantums might be a brilliant idea. For such a small ship, engineering is unlikely...
by Enmui Darkheart
Sun May 02, 2010 11:37 pm
Forum: Approved Specifications
Topic: Steamrunner Class
Replies: 11
Views: 6025

Re: Steamrunner Class

Whoa I'd love one of these... >_>

:shock: applies.

edit

if there are no objections, could we push this one through with a basic set of specs and then readjust if there are complaints?
by Enmui Darkheart
Sun May 02, 2010 10:48 pm
Forum: Approved Specifications
Topic: Lexington Class
Replies: 21
Views: 10410

Re: Lexington Class

Hm, I think that the new maximum speed should take into account the heavier loading capacity, so this should be right. The dual core however would enable a lot more power to be dedicated towards weapons, especially since carriers are potentially sitting ducks once engaged. Then again, I think the Di...

Go to advanced search