Also, here is a link to the ship:
http://i483.photobucket.com/albums/rr19 ... nClass.jpg
http://kuckuk333.deviantart.com/art/Sun ... lass&qo=62
Search found 25 matches
- Thu Mar 31, 2011 1:24 am
- Forum: Rejected Specifications
- Topic: PROPOSED RONIN-CLASS STARSHIP SPECIFICATIONS
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7191
- Thu Mar 31, 2011 12:27 am
- Forum: Rejected Specifications
- Topic: PROPOSED RONIN-CLASS STARSHIP SPECIFICATIONS
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7191
Re: PROPOSED RONIN-CLASS STARSHIP SPECIFICATIONS
Much like what our good R&D Director started saying: the idea stems from the amphibious assault vessel currently employed by many modern navies. Capable of carrying a significantly sized amount of soldiers and equipment and everything they may need to be forward deployed for rapid response. The US N...
- Wed Jun 30, 2010 3:56 am
- Forum: Approved Specifications
- Topic: Miranda Class
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2868
Re: Miranda Class
It is a smaller ship, yes. Chances are they are much smaller rooms than you would find on a sovereign or galaxy. But consider that your intrepid has a lot more equipment to house than this 100 year old warhorse. The computer core is smaller, there is no aerowing dock. Not as many labs. Plus a lot of...
- Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:58 pm
- Forum: Approved Specifications
- Topic: Miranda Class
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2868
Re: Miranda Class
I don't know if it is my affinity for things with roll bars... Like Jeeps, I guess... But I have a "thing" for the Miranda because it is a starship with a rollbar. More importantly, I see it as the jeep of the Federation. People can use it when they need to in a variety of missions. Putski, is there...
- Mon Jun 07, 2010 2:10 am
- Forum: Approved Specifications
- Topic: Sovereign Class
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3991
Re: Sovereign Class
It's an explorer. Since R&D and the crew has pretty much established that a Long Range Explorer does not carry marines, and this being a long range explorer, we don't have much in the way to say: "all but this one."
Unless you want to call this a battle cruiser.
Unless you want to call this a battle cruiser.
- Fri May 28, 2010 5:29 pm
- Forum: Mission Control
- Topic: Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed...
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2896
Re: Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed...
You definitely bring up good points, and somethng worthy of a fleets attention. As I sit in my Chief of Fleet Ops cubicle, and others can attest, I am always asking what we can do next? Where do we go from here. Now, take a look at the fleet map: we are responsible for galactic south. I do not see t...
- Wed May 26, 2010 12:53 am
- Forum: Website Helpdesk
- Topic: WEBSITE UPDATE I NEED YOUR OPPINION
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3603
Re: WEBSITE UPDATE I NEED YOUR OPPINION
You might want to try putting the Pegasus Fleet Links in your database, rather than on the main page. People without widescreen computer screens will have to scroll over to find "the ship" or "the sim".
Also, try to avoid caps-lock.
Keep up the good work though.
-Cdre Reinhart
Also, try to avoid caps-lock.
Keep up the good work though.
-Cdre Reinhart
- Mon May 24, 2010 9:50 pm
- Forum: Approved Specifications
- Topic: Excalibur Class
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4217
Re: Excalibur Class
Deck 26. I think he just called it "security" rather than "Security chief's office".
- Mon May 24, 2010 5:50 pm
- Forum: Approved Specifications
- Topic: Excalibur Class
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4217
Re: Excalibur Class
Gotcha. Was just checking!
- Mon May 24, 2010 12:45 pm
- Forum: Approved Specifications
- Topic: Excalibur Class
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4217
Re: Excalibur Class
Are you sure there aren't shuttle bays higher up on the ship, closer to the saucer/stardive "neck"?
Every image I have see. On the Excalibur has shown two doors there.
Every image I have see. On the Excalibur has shown two doors there.