[Proposed] New Insignia-Class Specifications

Archived discussions of all specifications which have been approved and put into use by the Research & Development Department
Post Reply
User avatar
Joe_Rhimer
Master Chief Petty Officer
Master Chief Petty Officer
Posts: 329
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:52 am
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Contact:

[Proposed] New Insignia-Class Specifications

Post by Joe_Rhimer » Tue Oct 30, 2012 4:55 am

Click the link to view the proposed Insignia class star ship specifications. As always, this is now open for discussion.

Insignia-class
Image
ImageImage

User avatar
FruitLoop
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 733
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 10:29 pm
Location: Deep South, USA
Contact:

Re: [Proposed] New Insignia-Class Specifications

Post by FruitLoop » Tue Oct 30, 2012 7:32 pm

I'm not one of the extremely tech minded people, but shouldn't "Science Science Office" be something more like "Chief Science Officer's Office"?

User avatar
Williams
Admin
Admin
Posts: 824
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 2:20 pm
Location: England
Contact:

Re: [Proposed] New Insignia-Class Specifications

Post by Williams » Tue Oct 30, 2012 9:30 pm

Haven't you ever heard of the renowned field of Science Science? It's far more highly respected than the field of regular Science, but its practitioners are rare, considering each must be individually approved by the Grand Poobah of Sciencey Things of Scientific Sciencemess

User avatar
Joe_Rhimer
Master Chief Petty Officer
Master Chief Petty Officer
Posts: 329
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:52 am
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Contact:

Re: [Proposed] New Insignia-Class Specifications

Post by Joe_Rhimer » Wed Oct 31, 2012 4:25 am

Good sir, I knew that you would understand the truth about Science Science!

And yes, that should be Chief Science. That's evidence that your friendly neighborhood Deputy Deputy of R&D was way too tired from real life work when writing up the deck listing ;)

It now stands corrected.
Image
ImageImage

User avatar
Confusedfire
Petty Officer 1st Class
Petty Officer 1st Class
Posts: 199
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 8:10 pm
Contact:

Re: [Proposed] New Insignia-Class Specifications

Post by Confusedfire » Mon Nov 05, 2012 9:04 pm

In the overview you have it as a light cruiser but in the specs you have cruiser which is it...There is a difference after all :D :D
Image
Task Force 11 Executive Officer

"Spot this is down...down is good!"

- LCDR Data

User avatar
Williams
Admin
Admin
Posts: 824
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 2:20 pm
Location: England
Contact:

Re: [Proposed] New Insignia-Class Specifications

Post by Williams » Mon Nov 05, 2012 9:53 pm

/me points to the ship categories on our specs pages

For purposes of categorisation, we've got a far simpler system than would be arguably canon. Out of Carrier, Corvette, Cruiser, Destroyer, Explorer, Ship-of-the-Line and Support Ships, Cruiser's where a 'light cruiser' best fits :P

User avatar
Joe_Rhimer
Master Chief Petty Officer
Master Chief Petty Officer
Posts: 329
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:52 am
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Contact:

Re: [Proposed] New Insignia-Class Specifications

Post by Joe_Rhimer » Tue Nov 06, 2012 3:44 am

Indeed, actually if you look at the specs sidebar, it is listed as a Cruiser. Light cruiser was more for fluff than anything lol. I'll update that.
Image
ImageImage

Post Reply

Return to “Approved Specifications”