Click the link to view the proposed Insignia class star ship specifications. As always, this is now open for discussion.
Insignia-class
[Proposed] New Insignia-Class Specifications
Moderator: Clement
- Joe_Rhimer
- Master Chief Petty Officer
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:52 am
- Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
- Contact:
- FruitLoop
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 733
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 10:29 pm
- Location: Deep South, USA
- Contact:
Re: [Proposed] New Insignia-Class Specifications
I'm not one of the extremely tech minded people, but shouldn't "Science Science Office" be something more like "Chief Science Officer's Office"?
Re: [Proposed] New Insignia-Class Specifications
Haven't you ever heard of the renowned field of Science Science? It's far more highly respected than the field of regular Science, but its practitioners are rare, considering each must be individually approved by the Grand Poobah of Sciencey Things of Scientific Sciencemess
- Joe_Rhimer
- Master Chief Petty Officer
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:52 am
- Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
- Contact:
Re: [Proposed] New Insignia-Class Specifications
Good sir, I knew that you would understand the truth about Science Science!
And yes, that should be Chief Science. That's evidence that your friendly neighborhood Deputy Deputy of R&D was way too tired from real life work when writing up the deck listing![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
It now stands corrected.
And yes, that should be Chief Science. That's evidence that your friendly neighborhood Deputy Deputy of R&D was way too tired from real life work when writing up the deck listing
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
It now stands corrected.
![Image](http://asger.microbrewgames.net/images/Keith_Sig.png)
![Image](http://asger.microbrewgames.net/images/RAdm_sig.png)
-
- Chief Petty Officer
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 8:10 pm
Re: [Proposed] New Insignia-Class Specifications
In the overview you have it as a light cruiser but in the specs you have cruiser which is it...There is a difference after all
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Captain Neela Izal
Commanding Officer TF37
Commanding Officer SB-812
"Spot this is down...down is good!"
- LCDR Data
Commanding Officer TF37
Commanding Officer SB-812
"Spot this is down...down is good!"
- LCDR Data
Re: [Proposed] New Insignia-Class Specifications
/me points to the ship categories on our specs pages
For purposes of categorisation, we've got a far simpler system than would be arguably canon. Out of Carrier, Corvette, Cruiser, Destroyer, Explorer, Ship-of-the-Line and Support Ships, Cruiser's where a 'light cruiser' best fits![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
For purposes of categorisation, we've got a far simpler system than would be arguably canon. Out of Carrier, Corvette, Cruiser, Destroyer, Explorer, Ship-of-the-Line and Support Ships, Cruiser's where a 'light cruiser' best fits
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
- Joe_Rhimer
- Master Chief Petty Officer
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:52 am
- Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
- Contact:
Re: [Proposed] New Insignia-Class Specifications
Indeed, actually if you look at the specs sidebar, it is listed as a Cruiser. Light cruiser was more for fluff than anything lol. I'll update that.
![Image](http://asger.microbrewgames.net/images/Keith_Sig.png)
![Image](http://asger.microbrewgames.net/images/RAdm_sig.png)