Page 1 of 1

[Proposed] New Insignia-Class Specifications

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 4:55 am
by Joe_Rhimer
Click the link to view the proposed Insignia class star ship specifications. As always, this is now open for discussion.

Insignia-class

Re: [Proposed] New Insignia-Class Specifications

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 7:32 pm
by FruitLoop
I'm not one of the extremely tech minded people, but shouldn't "Science Science Office" be something more like "Chief Science Officer's Office"?

Re: [Proposed] New Insignia-Class Specifications

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 9:30 pm
by Williams
Haven't you ever heard of the renowned field of Science Science? It's far more highly respected than the field of regular Science, but its practitioners are rare, considering each must be individually approved by the Grand Poobah of Sciencey Things of Scientific Sciencemess

Re: [Proposed] New Insignia-Class Specifications

Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 4:25 am
by Joe_Rhimer
Good sir, I knew that you would understand the truth about Science Science!

And yes, that should be Chief Science. That's evidence that your friendly neighborhood Deputy Deputy of R&D was way too tired from real life work when writing up the deck listing ;)

It now stands corrected.

Re: [Proposed] New Insignia-Class Specifications

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 9:04 pm
by Confusedfire
In the overview you have it as a light cruiser but in the specs you have cruiser which is it...There is a difference after all :D :D

Re: [Proposed] New Insignia-Class Specifications

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 9:53 pm
by Williams
/me points to the ship categories on our specs pages

For purposes of categorisation, we've got a far simpler system than would be arguably canon. Out of Carrier, Corvette, Cruiser, Destroyer, Explorer, Ship-of-the-Line and Support Ships, Cruiser's where a 'light cruiser' best fits :P

Re: [Proposed] New Insignia-Class Specifications

Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 3:44 am
by Joe_Rhimer
Indeed, actually if you look at the specs sidebar, it is listed as a Cruiser. Light cruiser was more for fluff than anything lol. I'll update that.